Come on, you legless little prick: Sue me for copyright infringement!I've said this before, and I'll say it again:
Redskins owner Daniel Snyder is a puffy-faced, Napoleonic, coprophiliac homunculus who in a just world would be forced to crawl nude over broken glass to apologize for this outrage before being clapped in the stocks in Lafayette Park to be pelted with offal.
15 comments:
Ok. Thanks for that. Now, tell us how you REALLY feel!!!!
FedEx would be half empty if they didn't force folks to make a long term commitment to mediocracy. I really don't understand why folks will re-up when the team isn't very good. I guess that's what real fans do, but that's a lot of money for the privilege of watching a team of dubious quality.
Snyder can say he wants to win,loves the fans, etc., but he's just another jerk owner sticking it to the paying customers. I especially like the fact that he resells the vacated seats AND takes the judgement dollars too. What a prince. I think you were too kind in your comments about him.
(Coming from Chicago, I am familiar with jerk owners and teams of dubious quality. Cubs are worth $800 mil now and suck. Bears, Sox, Bulls, all the same.)
xj
What an absolute bastard.
dude I'll shove my arm shoulder-deep up his ass and pull out his Isles Of Langerhans for some yard work and a meal.
Foot th' bill for a yearly checkup and I'll put it all on youtube.
I dont know what to say. Good post.
A midget among lesser men.
Good news -Looks like they vacated the judgement. Too lazy to link.
The man is total scum. Aside from his team, he also did irreparable damage to federal land and the beautiful C&O Canal. But wait: there is some justice in this cruel world. Take a stroll just north of Swain's Lock and you can see his vulgar monstrosity looming over the world like something out of LOTR, morder's tower, etc. But note the erosion around the ramparts, and that his fuck-dump looks as if it is about to tumble into the canal. Yes, he is paying the price for his sleazy acts. Beautiful!
Any opinion on The New Remastered Beatles?
I bought 'Sgt Pepper' as a test. (My first choice, 'Revolver', wasn't there).
After the endless hype I read from all concerned about how it was now, supposedly, like being 'in the room' as it was recorded, i literally cannot hear any improvement in clarity or sound quality over my last copy of 'Pepper' - the Mobile Fidelity Sound Labs 24 Bit Stereo Remaster.
The only difference I *can* hear is bog standard compression making it a bit louder than the other release.
What are the other discs like? Did they freshly remix them for stereo ala the 'Songtrack', or have they stuck with the bizarre stereo mixes on the original cds, that will sound bizarre on Ipods? I feel like I was burned by hype here, big time, and am wary of spending any more money I don't really have buying the others.
This blog has become soooo quiet that if I hold it to my ear I think I can hear China.
Damn Neddie, I hope you're alright.
Say Neddie, are you OK? Must not be or you would have posted something by now. Oh dear. Please say something!
Hope all is well. Thought you might enjoy some NoVa heritage/history stuff:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09296/1007186-37.stm?cmpid=newspanel1
http://www.hallowedground.org/maps/map-journey.html
I'm really missing your posts here. Did the Redskins take umbrage at your last post and kidnap you, Neddie? As the last poster said, hope all is well.
OMG. Facility.
Post a Comment